Claim Disputes

Appraisal Clause

A policy provision for resolving disputes over the amount of a loss without litigation.

Last reviewed July 2026 against primary sources.

Key points

  • Appraisal resolves the amount of a loss, not whether the loss is covered. Coverage, causation, and exclusion disputes stay outside the panel and belong in court.
  • The structure is fixed by the policy: each side picks and pays its own disinterested appraiser, the two appraisers pick a neutral umpire, and a written decision signed by any two of the three binds both parties on the amount.
  • It is a contractual alternative to litigation and to the DFS mediation program under Fla. Stat. 627.7015, which is available before a policyholder commences appraisal or litigation.
  • Under Fla. Stat. 627.70152, a Florida property insurer may require appraisal or another form of alternative dispute resolution in response to a policyholder's presuit notice of intent to litigate, and the statute tolls the limitations deadline while that process proceeds.
  • Either the policyholder or the insurer can typically invoke appraisal, and the outcome is binding on the amount, so the choice of appraiser and umpire matters a great deal.

What it means

The appraisal clause is a provision found in most Florida residential and commercial property insurance policies that creates a binding process for resolving a dispute over the amount of a covered loss. It is important to understand its narrow scope: appraisal decides how much is owed, not whether the loss is covered in the first place. If your insurer agrees the damage is covered but you and the carrier cannot agree on the dollar value of the repairs, appraisal is the mechanism the policy sets aside for settling that difference. Questions of coverage, causation, policy interpretation, and whether a peril is excluded generally remain outside the appraisal panel's authority and are decided by the parties, and if necessary, by a court.

The clause exists because valuation disagreements are common and are usually about numbers rather than law. A homeowner's contractor may price a roof replacement at one figure while the insurer's adjuster prices repair at a much lower figure. Rather than force every such dispute into court, the policy provides a faster, contract-based method to reach a number. The mechanics are consistent across most Florida policies: each party selects and pays for its own competent, disinterested appraiser. The two appraisers then attempt to agree on the amount of loss. If they cannot, they select a neutral third party called an umpire. A written decision agreed to by any two of the three, meaning two appraisers, or one appraiser and the umpire, sets the amount of loss and binds both sides.

In the Florida claims landscape, appraisal is one of several off-ramps from litigation. It sits alongside the mediation program administered by the Department of Financial Services under Florida Statute 627.7015, which offers an informal, nonbinding alternative for personal lines and commercial residential disputes. That mediation statute treats mediation and appraisal as parallel alternatives, and it makes mediation available before a policyholder commences the appraisal process or litigation. Under that statute, if a policyholder requests mediation and the result is rejected by either party, the policyholder is not required to submit to a contractual appraisal process as a precondition to legal action.

Appraisal is also woven into the presuit framework of Florida Statute 627.70152, which governs suits arising under a property insurance policy. Under that section, before a claimant can sue a residential or commercial property insurer, the claimant must serve a written notice of intent to initiate litigation on the Department of Financial Services at least 10 business days before filing, and the insurer is given an opportunity to respond. Among the responses the statute contemplates for a disputed amount, the insurer may make a settlement offer or require the claimant to participate in appraisal or another method of alternative dispute resolution. The statute tolls the applicable limitations period under Section 95.11 while that process runs, and if appraisal or other dispute resolution is not concluded within the timeframe the statute allows, the claimant may proceed. In practice, this means appraisal is not just a policy term a homeowner can invoke; it is also something the carrier may invoke in response to a presuit notice.

In practice

On a real Florida claim, appraisal usually surfaces after the insurer has accepted that some damage is covered but has issued a payment far below what the homeowner's contractor or public adjuster believes the repair actually costs. One party sends a written demand for appraisal invoking the clause, names its appraiser, and the clock starts on selecting the second appraiser and, if needed, an umpire. Because a decision by any two of the three is binding on the amount, the quality and independence of the appraiser you select is one of the most important decisions in the process. An appraiser who understands construction pricing, Florida building code upgrade requirements, and how to document scope thoroughly can make a substantial difference in the final award.

A common carrier tactic tied to appraisal is trying to route a coverage or causation fight into the appraisal panel, where it does not belong. For example, an insurer may agree to appraisal and then argue through its appraiser that most of the damage predates the storm or falls under an exclusion, effectively litigating coverage inside a process meant only for valuation. Policyholders should insist that the panel stay in its lane and value the loss, leaving genuinely disputed coverage questions for resolution elsewhere. Another pitfall is umpire selection: an umpire who is not truly neutral, or who lacks relevant expertise, can shape the entire outcome, so scrutiny of proposed umpires is warranted.

Timing and procedure also matter under Florida law. Because Section 627.70152 lets a carrier require appraisal in response to a presuit notice and tolls the limitations deadline while it runs, a homeowner should treat an appraisal demand as a serious, deadline-sensitive event rather than a delay tactic to ignore. Documenting the full scope of damage before appraisal, preserving evidence, and getting a detailed, code-compliant estimate on record early gives your appraiser the strongest possible foundation to argue for a fair award.

Real scenarios

Roof valuation gap after a windstorm

A homeowner's contractor estimates a full roof replacement at roughly $38,000 after wind damage, but the insurer's adjuster approves a partial repair valued near $9,000. The insurer concedes the roof was damaged by a covered peril, so the fight is purely about amount. The homeowner invokes the appraisal clause, each side names an appraiser, and after the two appraisers disagree, an umpire is selected. A written award signed by the umpire and the homeowner's appraiser sets the loss at a figure that funds a full replacement, binding the insurer. These figures are illustrative of how a valuation gap can play out.

Coverage dispute that does not belong in appraisal

After water damage, the insurer denies the claim outright, arguing the loss was caused by long-term seepage excluded by the policy rather than a sudden pipe burst. The homeowner demands appraisal, but because the dispute is about causation and coverage, not the dollar amount, appraisal is the wrong tool. The threshold question of whether the loss is covered has to be resolved before any valuation panel can meaningfully act, so this dispute proceeds through the presuit and litigation track rather than being decided by appraisers.

Carrier requires appraisal in response to a presuit notice

A homeowner serves a notice of intent to initiate litigation on the Department of Financial Services over an underpaid interior and structural claim of roughly $75,000. In its response, the insurer requires the claimant to participate in appraisal under the policy. The statutory limitations deadline is tolled while appraisal proceeds. The panel ultimately awards a figure well above the insurer's original payment, resolving the amount without the case ever being filed in court. The dollar amounts here are examples, not real data.

Related guide: Denied Insurance Claim in Florida? What to Do Next

Official sources

General guidance only, not legal advice. Statutes and codes change; verify against the current source.

Appraisal Clause FAQs

No. Appraisal is limited to determining the amount of a loss the insurer agrees is covered. Disputes about whether a peril is covered, what caused the damage, or how a policy exclusion applies are generally outside the appraisal panel's authority and are resolved by the parties or, if necessary, by a court.

Not sure how this affects your claim?

Foremost Public Adjusters has recovered millions for policyholders across South Florida. If your claim was denied, delayed, or underpaid, we will review it for free. No recovery, no fee.